- Aug 25, 2010
- 55,325
- 100,774
danielneeds;2216590[B said:]But surely Citeh's current progress, along with the post-Del Bosque Galactico years at Madrid show that having a huge budget and squad of superstars doesn't guarantee success?[/b] It takes a very special kind of person to manage that kind of pressure, and those kinds of egos. That is exactly what Mourinho is, and the kind of challenge he looks for.
You are painting Mourinho as a romantic, whereas the cold hard facts of history show he is the ultimate pragmatist.
True, but I think City have a squad which is extremely powerful and physical, and with some tweaks, in terms of being more ambitious and adventurous, that they are ultimately a better prospect in terms of achieving things - if you keep fishing you're going to catch a fish sooner rather than later.
Harry would do a better job than Mancini, I am absoluetly certain about that.
I accept your point, there is a skill in managing big egos etc but the point is he has an open cheque to do what he likes with and whatever way you cut it, it takes the gloss off.
Anybody and everybody would be more impressed if he won the League with Spurs than if he did it with City. Not saying he's necessarilly thinking like that.
Finally, he is more of a pragmatist, but that doesn't mean he wouldn't flirt with the idea...all I'm saying is never say never.