- Aug 13, 2005
- 46,690
- 104,977
You couldn't find? That means nothing, it could be anywhere.
took me 10 seconds To find what he said about him last summer. Will post it in his thread. It was Lloris himself, not itk and isnt negative
You couldn't find? That means nothing, it could be anywhere.
Why anyone thought it would be any different this Summer is beyond me.If we’re trying to balance the squad we should have more than 1 RB and a striker in before the season starts. Seems like more same old same old
Maybe because Jose's word or ITK reports that this summer will be different?Why anyone thought it would be any different this Summer is beyond me.
We hear the same literally every year.Maybe because Jose's word or ITK reports that this summer will be different?
If he doesn't want to be here then I really really hope we do as it will just cause disruption within the squad and negative media all season which won't help our cause at all. Big shame if it hasn't worked out for him but hopefully we can cut our losses and get close to the cash we paid for him to we can re-invest it in other areas. It seems from what Herc and other ITK's have recently been saying that RB and ST are next priorities and we have a small budget for those e.g. Aurier sale money will go on a new RB and other players sold will go towards the ST position and then anything else will be dependent on sales of other players of which Ndombele would be a big cash cow. Issue now is will anyone pay for him and if so can we get it sorted before the last day of the window otherwise we will have no time to spend the sale funds to replace him or further improve the balance of the squad.
Interesting next month or so ahead.
There seems little point creating an emotional space in your consciousness where TN is somehow a victim of Mourinho’s ruthless pragmatism. We’ve heard this from so many sources that he’s a lazy bastard who’s surrounded himself with a disruptive entourage. Pre-Mourinho he was hardly consistent, nor has he been all season. When all the evidence you can possible find points to him being at fault, then it’s probably true.
Ignoring this is like being in a relationship with a profoundly attractive person, and even though you catch them in the arms of someone else, you make lame excuses because the potential of what you’d like the relationship to be is far more attractive than the gritty, shitty truth
Let’s be honest... 2 wrongs don’t make a right ?
If we could possibly replace Ndombele for Sabitzer we would be buying a less talented player but massively improving the team.
Hmmmm, this is nonsense. Driven by the fact that you obviously dislike Mourinho. Tanguy hasn't impressed with his work-rate or his pressing, he's looked decent in fits and starts but nothing as special as you make out.
I'll back the manager on this one and if Tanguy is tearing things up in a years time? Then good luck to him, he'll have learnt his lesson and decided to pull his finger out.
We can't afford to wait for him.
I was going to write a long post about how much I hate laziness and bad attitudes, but f**k it, I can't be bothered.
I would think so as it does not make sense either tactically or financially. It does not even make sentimentally as that boat has sailed and we as a club have moved on.Can't comment on the rest of that because I don't know. The Bale stuff however is 100% not true.
I know you’ve always loved me. Certainly wasn’t a mod though!Come on you big jock lump you. As an ex COYS mod(at least I think you were) you know rules are more important than even life itself. Breaking said rules are punishable by death. Well as far as COYS were concerned they were.
I’ve read them. A couple of times. And I just don’t understand I’m afraid. If we are to discuss the day’s ITK, and that ITK says we are in for a £50m striker, are we not able to discuss who that may be? I only posted a name of a possibility after reading several pages of Ings and Jiminez.Then i'd make it my business to find out before you find yourself wishing you had. Up to you though.
I’ve read them. A couple of times. And I just don’t understand I’m afraid. If we are to discuss the day’s ITK, and that ITK says we are in for a £50m striker, are we not able to discuss who that may be? I only posted a name of a possibility after reading several pages of Ings and Jiminez.
So it’s not that I haven’t read the rules. Actually acutely aware that writing this is probably breaking them, but I can’t post my question on the rules page, so I’ve little recourse.
Of course I do mate.I know you’ve always loved me. Certainly wasn’t a mod though!
It can be confusing, I think this thread is supposed to mostly be ITK then maybe a few relevant comments and that's it. The site has decided that the priority for this thread is the ease of finding relevant information quickly and easily, and is how many people use this thread.I’ve read them. A couple of times. And I just don’t understand I’m afraid. If we are to discuss the day’s ITK, and that ITK says we are in for a £50m striker, are we not able to discuss who that may be? I only posted a name of a possibility after reading several pages of Ings and Jiminez.
So it’s not that I haven’t read the rules. Actually acutely aware that writing this is probably breaking them, but I can’t post my question on the rules page, so I’ve little recourse.
FYPWe hear the same literally everyyearwindow.
Also, what has Jose said?
Big clubs aren't skint mate.
going back to the earlier Ndombele ITK - i'm pretty certain that on this forum some 6 or 9 months or so ago that there was ITK from someone that Lloris had been sounded out about Ndombele and advised Poch to steer clear based off his experiences of working with him in the French national squad. Would be quite telling now as obviously back then we were still perhaps a little blinkered as to the extent of his attitude problems.
Because some ITKS keep saying we are trying for him. I agree it’s boring now, but some folk like to cling on to any hope!!So tired of the Bale links. Why even bother mentioning him at this point?
I’ll add to the likelihood of my rectum getting a dose from the stick, but I kind of agree with where you’re coming from... seems it was fine for a couple of folks to say £50mill striker, must be Ings, or must be Jimenez, then DCL got chucked in... but hey, don’t mention one more? Wasn’t you saying you hoped / wanted to sign him etc... but must be a line somewhere I guess?! ?I’ve read them. A couple of times. And I just don’t understand I’m afraid. If we are to discuss the day’s ITK, and that ITK says we are in for a £50m striker, are we not able to discuss who that may be? I only posted a name of a possibility after reading several pages of Ings and Jiminez.
So it’s not that I haven’t read the rules. Actually acutely aware that writing this is probably breaking them, but I can’t post my question on the rules page, so I’ve little recourse.
I’ve read them. A couple of times. And I just don’t understand I’m afraid. If we are to discuss the day’s ITK, and that ITK says we are in for a £50m striker, are we not able to discuss who that may be? I only posted a name of a possibility after reading several pages of Ings and Jiminez.
So it’s not that I haven’t read the rules. Actually acutely aware that writing this is probably breaking them, but I can’t post my question on the rules page, so I’ve little recourse.