- Jun 7, 2004
- 18,106
- 45,030
That was the whole point of shaping the comment as I did. It was intentional: I shunted the personal views in a minor comment at the end and avoided making specific recommendations, like "drop Lamela" or"the diamond is a disaster". "A bit of consistency would be a good thing" is not the same as "Eriksen is fucking useless, why can't Pochettino see this?"I guess opinions are okay after all then?
ANSWER = On a topic as unimportant as what particular course of action at a given moment might be best for the fortunes of Tottenham Hotspur, they totally are. Your crusade against the Unholy Subjective Opinion is totally out of place in Spurs Chat, you well-meaning-but-uptight wally.
It's not about a ban on "opinion", if you must use the 21c. sense of this debased word. It's about not wasting time on self-indulgent, arrogant and childish insistences on specific players or formations, as if Pochettino is going to read the thread and go "Oh! XXXX SC member has a much better idea, so I'll change my plans and go for that, instead of using my decades of experience in professional football!". It's infantile and it constitutes over 50% of the posts in advance of matches.
What has progressively got further and further up my nose is that, when discussions on formations and selections arise - similarly with transfers and the stadium - I post 95% about what I expect the club or the manager to do and every fucking reply responds on the assumption that I was posting what I wanted the club or the manager to do. Every time.