- Jun 6, 2005
- 53,372
- 67,022
I disagree. And I guess we'll see once Lee's fit.
Who is then? Judging by past performances, experience, overall skill and general consistency?
I disagree. And I guess we'll see once Lee's fit.
Lee is so average...I really don't know why some of you rate him so highly. Yes sometimes he has a good game but it's rare. He stands of attacking wingers WAY to much and allows the cross in 90% of the time. He's passing is distinctly average and he always comes in on his right foot when attacking. He's not exactly the worlds strongest and can easily get knocked off the ball and he's delivery ain't great either.
Why the Lee worship ?? :duh:
And why the Lee worship? Well if you can't work that out then i'd wonder if you are actually even a Spurs fan... Look at the shirt he's wearing and how hard he works, that might give you a clue :up:
then, as i did in the last post, ask again - who is our first choice left back, if Lee isn't? :shrug:No Rocksuperstar m8. Your opinion regarding this thread/topic is no probem and your ofcourse, entitled to them. I just don't think you should question someones loyality to the club because there view does not coincide with your own :roll:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocksuperstar
Come off it, Lee is by far the number one choice for left back - if you had to pick our strongest team then there's no doubt he'd our left back
^^ That is what I was disagreeing with m8.
Lee can defend though, and has shown that he can on alot of occasions, infact most of the last 2 seasons he has defended with no help from midfield ahead of him, msotly being outnumbers 2-1 and still managing to do well 9not amazing, but who would with 2-1's most the time) there are better players out there at LB, but none we can really get... Lee is the best option we have just now, and even when Bale is fit i would say Lee gets ahead! no idea what Gilberto is like though :shrug:
then, as i did in the last post, ask again - who is our first choice left back, if Lee isn't? :shrug:
If you think Bale is, after three appearances, then i think you're putting too much expectation on a lad who is only barely old enough to sign his own paperwork at the hospital. He's also a very hot prospect who i would much prefer to see in three years time pounding up and down the wing, rather than for six months before he's crocked beyond repair as his young bones won't form properly now. It's a catch 22 for the club, but sensible heads surely can see why pushing him to reach that level now is just a bit risky.
Other than him, i explained the reasons above...
can't agree with this.
The LB position in the last couple of seasons has enjoyed more protection from the player in front than the RB position has.
Lenny is pretty much an out and out winger and has played the majority of his football on the right. He has offered some protection to his FB but not a great deal although this is changing rapidly under Ramos.
Our left sided midfiled player has usually been Steed, TT or Davids although all have tucked in to a degree they all have far stronger defensive games than Lennon does. When we haven't had possesion all of these 3 have quickly got themselves into position to assist the LB. Our width on this side may have affected our attacking options but it certainly hasn't affected our defending on this side.
Interestingly when Jol played Lennon the left for a short while and tucked the RM player in slightly nobody claimed that Chimbonda was suffering from a lack of protection in front of him or indeed that the LB now had the luxury of protection playing in front of him.
Bale is weak and lightweight - he'll not be an effective LB for us, ever, as far as i'm concerned.