Are you really? This is Spurs after all.Very surprised to read either Adama or a striker.
If it’s a loan then Mendes would definetly need to be used for them to get a replacement
Adama or striker...... striker please
Isn't it shifting it all till next year? In that case I can't see us signing anyone next summer starting at 100 million down, not sure it's a good thing.
Right and when Kane gets injured again and we have no no.9 for two months, then what?I would rather go for Adama, who terrifies most defense. And clearly, he plays far far better with a proper no 9 (refer his 19/20 stats)...
Right and when Kane gets injured again and we have no no.9 for two months, then what?
That will be City's problem...Right and when Kane gets injured again and we have no no.9 for two months, then what?
There are players out there. Leicester have Vardy, Inecacho and Daka.
This club seems utterly allergic to signing strikers. If Kane is injured we are back to Son up top like we were three years ago, its lunacy. Son is the only reliable scorer we have apart from Kane.
Right and when Kane gets injured again and we have no no.9 for two months, then what?
There are players out there. Leicester have Vardy, Inecacho and Daka.
This club seems utterly allergic to signing strikers. If Kane is injured we are back to Son up top like we were three years ago, its lunacy. Son is the only reliable scorer we have apart from Kane.