- Oct 1, 2003
- 14,324
- 7,399
They weren't distributing child porn, the pitch invasion was just a prank. There are people who have done much more serious crime that are being let off all the time.
They weren't distributing child porn, the pitch invasion was just a prank. There are people who have done much more serious crime that are being let off all the time.
We should pursue them for damages. The BBC in their gossip column described them as Spurs fans. Do we know who they support? I thought they were goons and the BBC should make this clear.
The punishment must fit the crime, the fine is about right, what's the point of putting them in jail or giving them a heavy fine which they can't pay? It would be destroying their lives for no good reason and on the flipside they may get more drawn into crime.Oh, that's alright then, is it?
Hardly the point . Spurs must pay 11 Gs for this . Should totally go after these wankers for it .
the watching fans seemed to think it was funny at the time but how does a fine of £150 deter anyone else doing it? what were all those tweets about doing it at another location if it was a spur of the moment decision?
They tweeted that 'they are Ars*nal fans and they had to do it'.
Take it out of Ades wages.
A fine of £150 will not stop them going into more crime. It is more like a reward than a deterrant. They will just see it as a sign of weakness. Spurs should not allow themselves to be pushed around.The punishment must fit the crime, the fine is about right, what's the point of putting them in jail or giving them a heavy fine which they can't pay? It would be destroying their lives for no good reason and on the flipside they may get more drawn into crime.
A fine of £150 will not stop them going into more crime. It is more like a reward than a deterrant. They will just see it as a sign of weakness. Spurs should not allow themselves to be pushed around.
Are you intentionally talkin bollox or just on a wind up?Take it out of Ades wages.