- Apr 9, 2018
- 3,925
- 3,646
Asiago!!!!!!!!!!!FUCK Eriksen! He has allowed himself to become such a cheese dick of a player.
Asiago!!!!!!!!!!!FUCK Eriksen! He has allowed himself to become such a cheese dick of a player.
It's all a bit echo-chamber for want of a better word where Eriksen is concerned now, people are just saying the same things over and over and its very circular in nature and to be honest, it's gotten boring now so the sooner he goes the better.
Him allowing himself to be like this is one issue. The club allowing it to get to this stage is another, more unexplored issue. So, rather than persist with the done to death 'this is how much I hate Eriksen' or 'this is how much of a **** Eriksen is' line of thinking, why not slag off the club for allowing it to get this far.
He should have been sold 2 years to 18 months ago when it started to become clear he wasn't going to sign a new deal, certainly the club should have a cut-off point, a deadline, signed by that time or we cut our losses kind of thing. People are going to say that's easy to say and it is. Easy to say, easy to do. There would have been takers as well.
Who's actually to blame? Pochettino? Levy? My guess is its possibly 50/50. But, seeing as people expect me to say it, I'll go for Levy. The buck stops there. Anyway, there you go, just for a change of pace........
*runs away
He should have been sold 2 years to 18 months ago when it started to become clear he wasn't going to sign a new deal, certainly the club should have a cut-off point, a deadline, signed by that time or we cut our losses kind of thing. People are going to say that's easy to say and it is. Easy to say, easy to do. There would have been takers as well.
Ivory tower stuff here.It's all a bit echo-chamber for want of a better word where Eriksen is concerned now, people are just saying the same things over and over and its very circular in nature and to be honest, it's gotten boring now so the sooner he goes the better.
Him allowing himself to be like this is one issue. The club allowing it to get to this stage is another, more unexplored issue. So, rather than persist with the done to death 'this is how much I hate Eriksen' or 'this is how much of a **** Eriksen is' line of thinking, why not slag off the club for allowing it to get this far.
He should have been sold 2 years to 18 months ago when it started to become clear he wasn't going to sign a new deal, certainly the club should have a cut-off point, a deadline, signed by that time or we cut our losses kind of thing. People are going to say that's easy to say and it is. Easy to say, easy to do. There would have been takers as well.
Who's actually to blame? Pochettino? Levy? My guess is its possibly 50/50. But, seeing as people expect me to say it, I'll go for Levy. The buck stops there. Anyway, there you go, just for a change of pace........
*runs away
Is it fuck, it's a fair enough questionIvory tower stuff here.
Be better.
Sell you're top player at the peak of his powers like he had done to so many managers before (considering this one is the best of his whole tenure) Vs keeping him about and then discovering why you have sold high the entire time as the players power becomes apparent.Is it fuck, it's a fair enough question
YOU be better. Jesus Christ.
Maybe Eriksen has seen the writing on the wall wrt Brexit and Boris and is just preparing to move abroad. Does anyone blame him?
It's all a bit echo-chamber for want of a better word where Eriksen is concerned now, people are just saying the same things over and over and its very circular in nature and to be honest, it's gotten boring now so the sooner he goes the better.
Him allowing himself to be like this is one issue. The club allowing it to get to this stage is another, more unexplored issue. So, rather than persist with the done to death 'this is how much I hate Eriksen' or 'this is how much of a **** Eriksen is' line of thinking, why not slag off the club for allowing it to get this far.
He should have been sold 2 years to 18 months ago when it started to become clear he wasn't going to sign a new deal, certainly the club should have a cut-off point, a deadline, signed by that time or we cut our losses kind of thing. People are going to say that's easy to say and it is. Easy to say, easy to do. There would have been takers as well.
Who's actually to blame? Pochettino? Levy? My guess is its possibly 50/50. But, seeing as people expect me to say it, I'll go for Levy. The buck stops there. Anyway, there you go, just for a change of pace........
*runs away
If you got back two years, A&C, there were still quite a few people that saw him as the messiah.
Yeah, they probably did, but I'm suggesting that there has to be a point where if negotiations aren't progressing, a decision is made to replace and sell. See below, I think we failed on both fronts.
Really I dont think the fans would have accepted Eriksen being sold at that time.
Not so sure about that, Levy would have (IMO) not been backwards in letting it be known the reasons for the sale, you'd for sure get a few who would be upset but only if we sold and didn't replace, again see below.......
One problem was definately Poch. Eriksen to me was the only playmaker we had for a long time (I wasnt a big fan to be honest I never saw him as a game changer) but he was the only playmaker we had and if playmaking was important for Poch why didnt he get Levy to buy one or two more
Now we're talking.........Did Poch ask, did Levy fail? As I said, there's probably questions to be asked regarding the approach both took to this.
Nah, plenty of flannel though!Whichever way we argue around it, at the end of the day, (IMO) it's got to be seen as a failure, a mistake. From someone at the club and as the buck stops with Levy then obviously he's included. How people can see letting what was probably a 60 million pound asset (if not more) walk away for free as understandable or unavoidable is beyond me. There's bound to be some criticism or questions asked.
No ivory was used in the writing of this post
Whichever way we argue around it, at the end of the day, (IMO) it's got to be seen as a failure, a mistake. From someone at the club and as the buck stops with Levy then obviously he's included. How people can see letting what was probably a 60 million pound asset (if not more) walk away for free as understandable or unavoidable is beyond me. There's bound to be some criticism or questions asked.
No ivory was used in the writing of this post
Yes, losing out on a multi-million pound asset is exactly the thing to do because of what some people on SC would have said. I'm pretty sure Levy doesn't factor SC's spunk trumpets into his thinking.Nah, plenty of flannel though!
If he sold him, he'd have been beaten with the usual 'selling club' and 'not backing the manager' stick - doesn't matter who beats him with it, I'll bet my left bollock it would have happened.
Once Eriksen leaves on a free there will be some clamour we don't pay the going rate for wages for top players again - right bollock.
Both bollocks on one player.
It's the most wonderful time of the year ...
That's what I'm saying! He should have anticipated and acted. Had he done so, he could have offset any fee with the Eriksen money. Instead we'll get nothing and have a player on our hands that's about as much use as a one legged man in an arse kicking contest.[
I don't think the fans would have accepted it at that time without a creative replacement with at least the same level of status.
... Nah the right one is intact, Levy doesn't factor the SC's spunk trumpets thinking into my metaphorical bet to myself ... Online.Yes, losing out on a multi-million pound asset is exactly the thing to do because of what some people on SC would have said. I'm pretty sure Levy doesn't factor SC's spunk trumpets into his thinking.
And once Eriksen leaves on a free there will be nothing but good riddance, so you just lost your right bollock
That's what I'm saying! He should have anticipated and acted. Had he done so, he could have offset any fee with the Eriksen money. Instead we'll get nothing and have a player on our hands that's about as much use as a one legged man in an arse kicking cont
Again, how that can be seen as excusable, understandable or unavoidable eludes me. But then again, as I get older a lot of other things pass me by too so perhaps I shouldn't be surprised