- Jul 24, 2005
- 30,536
- 46,630
I understand the earlier arguments about people wanting to keep Eriksen over signing Dybala, with the fact he’s PL proven and critical to how we play etc.
But with him on the last 12 months on his deal, until he puts pen to paper to re-sign, we could do a lot worse than Dybala. Yes, he could flop, but he could also be the amazing signing we hope he’d be on paper, and we could do a lot worse than replacing Eriksen with Dybala.
In all honesty I give it little chance, but if Eriksen has told the hierarchy he isn’t interested in signing a new deal, this is something we should look to persue imo despite the inevitable risks
An Eriksen/Dybala swap deal would make sense from a Tottenham perspective as we get to move the player before his contract expires and sign a major talent to replace him in the squad. It would make sense for Eriksen as he gets to move to a big club that will win the league, he gets big wages and he gets the challenge of playing in a new league. It probably makes sense for Dybala who gets to move to the Premier league with a side that already has an Argentinian manager and players, while possibly earning higher wagers than he's currently on. I'm just not sure if Juventus need Eriksen? Aren't they fully stocked in his position, or am I missing something?