- Aug 13, 2004
- 7,915
- 16,287
Trix has said yes.Does Conte want him? Anyone know?
Trix has said yes.Does Conte want him? Anyone know?
Watching his highlights reminded me of watching Lamela’s Roma clips before we signed him. Seems like he can beat a player but the worry is that he wouldn’t be able to pull that off with the pace of our league so would his dribbling be that effective?he looks like Lamala's bigger brother
I’m really not sure how you can post this as if it’s fact! Bizarre comment really.It is annoying me how often the ‘conte wants him so he must be good’ or ‘nobody wanted kulusevski and bentancur and look how they’ve turned out’ lines are being trotted out in this thread. People are allowed to think Zaniolo would be a bad signing without being met by a mass of Conte/Paratici apologists. Both of them have made massive blunders squad building in the past and will make more in the future. As far as I’m concerned, Zaniolo would be a pretty terrible signing and a super disappointing end to the window. Maddison is 5x better.
So you’re annoyed by people saying that, which generally, is in response to people saying what you’re trotting out.
You get annoyed, they get annoyed.
Allowed v Allowed ?
I’m sure we’ll all get over the conflicting onions
Yes but it’s not really constructive to just respond with ‘well conte wants him’. Most in here can’t actually give a reason why Zaniolo as a player/profile would be a good addition for us in response to people explaining why they don’t want him. I know (and rightly) so love Conte but I don’t see why posters can’t evaluate players objectively instead of hiding behind the fact that the manager wants him.So you’re annoyed by people saying that, which generally, is in response to people saying what you’re trotting out.
You get annoyed, they get annoyed.
Allowed v Allowed ?
I’m sure we’ll all get over the conflicting onions
It is annoying me how often the ‘conte wants him so he must be good’ or ‘nobody wanted kulusevski and bentancur and look how they’ve turned out’ lines are being trotted out in this thread. People are allowed to think Zaniolo would be a bad signing without being met by a mass of Conte/Paratici apologists. Both of them have made massive blunders squad building in the past and will make more in the future. As far as I’m concerned, Zaniolo would be a pretty terrible signing and a super disappointing end to the window. Maddison is 5x better.
He is shite -> If Conte wants him, do you care ?
Except lamela bang in goals galore…. This kid has terrible out putWatching his highlights reminded me of watching Lamela’s Roma clips before we signed him. Seems like he can beat a player but the worry is that he wouldn’t be able to pull that off with the pace of our league so would his dribbling be that effective?
I can’t really judge as I don’t remember ever seeing him play and I’m sure there’s probably lots more to his game.
Tbf, people defended Bergwijn to the hilt despite his 3 league goals last season and 1 (one) the season before. Not to mention Lucas. He delivered when it mattered.I haven't seen him play, so not gonna pretend I have. His two ACL tears do worry me though and for an attacking player to get just 2 league goals in 28 games isn't....great.
I'm not sure I've really seen an awful lot of this aside from "didn't he hurt his knees once" or "he's a poobag with poo in it and the poo smells".Yes but it’s not really constructive to just respond with ‘well conte wants him’. Most in here can’t actually give a reason why Zaniolo as a player/profile would be a good addition for us in response to people explaining why they don’t want him. I know (and rightly) so love Conte but I don’t see why posters can’t evaluate players objectively instead of hiding behind the fact that the manager wants him.
Lamela was not prolificExcept lamela bang in goals galore…. This kid has terrible out put
I’m really not sure how you can post this as if it’s fact! Bizarre comment really.