- May 31, 2012
- 2,758
- 8,535
And what if he says no which he probably wouldMake him captain, Offer him 300k a week contract + bonuses, invest 150 million into the squad.
We should easily have the money to do that with sales and transfer budget.
And what if he says no which he probably wouldMake him captain, Offer him 300k a week contract + bonuses, invest 150 million into the squad.
We should easily have the money to do that with sales and transfer budget.
I actually think he is that goodProblem there is Brighton would want almost all of the Kane money for him (I reckon they'd be asking for 70m or something ludicruous) and that's a hell of a lot to punt on an 18 year old even if he is hugely promising.
Yes. It’s the ultimate cos play for him. Gets to go round to the biggest clubs in the world and sit around the boardroom table with the most influential people on world football. I don’t blame him for that. Money can’t buy experiences like that.I suppose it could be. It could also be he'll pick up the phone to anyone who calls and tell them whatever they want to hear......... He definitely thinks he's more important/influencial than he is, and I know people in the industry who literally laugh at him and how he operates.
To be honest mate I don't really care, as he cost us nothing as far as a transfer fee is concerned.This isn't to do with Charlie Kane though, this is about Daniel Levy letting £70-100M walk out the door for free next June.
It staggers me that fans on one hand moan about Levy penny pinching over £4.50 (rightly so) on an incoming deal and on the other think he's willing to let a player worth up to 10% of the cost of the stadium walk for free??
Spurs are better with Kane obviously, but we've seen this year that he's no guarantee of a Champions League place. Levy is a businessman and 'hoping' we get into the CL and 'hoping' he signs a new deal won't even cross his mind.
This is a completely different scenario to City two years ago. Levy will put out the usual bluff that we have 'no intention of selling', he'll try to up the bids as much as he can, but any club in their right mind will know that Levy has nothing in his hand and it will happen.
Sorry lads, we need to brace the fact he's off.
If my aunt had a cock, she'd be my uncle.Kane is the best player in the group. No arguments.
But - I would say Richy + Maddison will have more goal involvements than Kane + Dier.
2 years ago when everyone played - Richarlison and Maddison had 39 g+a combined, Kane and Dier had 29
If Maddison comes in and plays - it will be almost certainly at the expense of a CB, hence the Kane + Dier comparison.
He would need a lump sum signing-on fee in the multi millions as well because that’s why he’d be missing out on by not leaving for free next year.Make him captain, Offer him 300k a week contract + bonuses, invest 150 million into the squad.
We should easily have the money to do that with sales and transfer budget.
Then make him Captain and Vice Captain. Offer him 500k a week. Invest 75m in the Squad. That sounds about right.And what if he says no which he probably would
Make him captain, Offer him 300k a week contract + bonuses, invest 150 million into the squad.
We should easily have the money to do that with sales and transfer budget.
If Kane won’t sign new deal then , I hope we get Goretzka or Sabitzer or Gnabry with 70m … then use that 70m on Jonathan David
His potential sale fee is like 10% of club debt. I cannot see Levy letting him go on a free next season - just can’t see it .