What's new

[Update 397] pablo re:Petrov/Bentley

chrissivad

Staff
May 20, 2005
51,646
58,072
Who pablo
Date 31st August
Site COYS

been told petrov from city will involve bentley going other way..petrov + £14-16m

as i said about three days ago Muntari wanted, but hard..think others have said same thing since.
 

Pringle

Well-Known Member
Dec 25, 2006
3,580
516
if true i would be delighted......... but why would City want him? they already have SWP!!
 

robin09

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2005
6,800
7,697
Nope. And dont see how Bentley would have any more first team football up there.
 

srups34

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2008
2,595
5,477
I think city are the only club whom we have any chance of getting our money back on Bentley.

Deal for me.
 

arail11

Member
Jun 11, 2008
783
0
Makes no sense getting kranjcar & petrov. Would rather keep Bentley for his crossing ability when crouch is on the field & we're getting desperate.
 

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Feb 1, 2005
55,635
205,515
Isn't he the chap who's only fit enough to play half a teams games a season? If so i'd rather we didn't.
 

kyle

Perennial Underachiever
Aug 16, 2008
370
121
The fee for this deal seems to be as much out as the fee for Kranjcar is in the thread below. There's no way we'd get that much for Bentley, richest club in the world or not.
 

danielneeds

Kick-Ass
May 5, 2004
24,183
48,814
I could live with Bentley going out on loan if we get Petrov and Kranjcar in. Much better balance to the squad then,
 

PhilosoSPUR

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2009
932
596
I really think Bentley will do better now that we have Crouch.

I think we are going with Plan B now that Modric is out, so I'd keep Bentley.
 

raf18

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2006
2,502
1,819
IMO the two players are on completely different levels (bentley better). A number of KEY reasons including age, injury record, versatility. Hope it isnt true but thanks for passing on the info
 
Top