- Jan 31, 2013
- 3,668
- 7,643
can't be Giroud then
Why?
can't be Giroud then
I have a hard time believing that any quality striker would be available on loan at this stage of the window. The likeliest candidate, at least among the names we've been linked to publicly, would seem to be Slimani. Not sure how I feel about that.@jetsetyid
what’s your thoughts on a striker in by Friday? Any chance?
The original JJetset
Strong chance. Loan
HW is short term for what?
Why?
Apocalypse Benteke
Hośe Wourinho
Crouch? Get him back from his media stuff...Not sure Rasiak ever officially retired...
Not sure he ever officially beganNot sure Rasiak ever officially retired...
Unless it was a loan with an option /obligationI have a hard time believing that any quality striker would be available on loan at this stage of the window. The likeliest candidate, at least among the names we've been linked to publicly, would seem to be Slimani. Not sure how I feel about that.
Only way Chelsea would think about giving us Giroud is if they fleeced us for him. On loan only helps us. Why would they do that?
He’s just scored. He wouldn’t fit in here.
Moura as CF thena couple of bits from dragon1, first bit was posted earlier today, before kwp to saints and before piatek to hertha
As things stand there is way under 50% chance of a second signing we are miles off on both striker deals
Regarding outs we are looking at a couple of loans right now
on bale: unless we are willing to break our wage structure and increase it 40/50% then unless Barnett does a huge u turn it ain’t happening
Madrid are willing sellers though