What's new

Player Watch Player Watch: Richarlison

coysjod

Well-Known Member
Feb 18, 2011
1,440
4,231
Ok, he could have done better with the header but so could Kane with his. How can he be match fit and sharp without minutes though? Can't help thinking that if he would've got 20-30 minutes in games with a start once in a while he would have been sharper when given the chance than this extremely stubborn behavior from the Conte clan.
 

alfie103

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2005
4,035
4,526
Ok, he could have done better with the header but so could Kane with his. How can he be match fit and sharp without minutes though? Can't help thinking that if he would've got 20-30 minutes in games with a start once in a while he would have been sharper when given the chance than this extremely stubborn behavior from the Conte clan.

For me, the problem with Richarlison is I don't see what he excels at. He isn't really quick, not particularly strong, average technical ability, doesn't seem to be a great finisher and isn't creative.
 
Last edited:

Joshua shepherd

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2013
1,355
3,364
Ok, he could have done better with the header but so could Kane with his. How can he be match fit and sharp without minutes though? Can't help thinking that if he would've got 20-30 minutes in games with a start once in a while he would have been sharper when given the chance than this extremely stubborn behavior from the Conte clan.

Not really comparable chances are they though.
 

ralphs bald spot

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2015
2,777
5,177
Not really comparable chances are they though.
Kane's one was behind him he had to readjust it was a poor cross really - Richardslon was on par with Darren Bent Sandra would have doubled her total - instead of just putting it on target as he should he tried to make sure probably because he hasn't been scoring but it was a dreadful miss -
 

coysjod

Well-Known Member
Feb 18, 2011
1,440
4,231
Not really comparable chances are they though.
Don't think I said they were comparable just that both could have done better? I totally agree that he should have got it on goal but my point still stands, give the guy minutes if you want him to find his rhythm.
 

easley91

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
19,225
55,128
Seen everyone talk about the header, but not the finish for the offside goal. That was classy.
 

ralphs bald spot

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2015
2,777
5,177
So even though he showed he could finish we'll just gloss over it? Okay then.
the header cost us three points it was a free header from 5 yards the game was done it was a terrible miss - the other one looked fortunate to me but I haven't seen it again- I think when you get to April and have still to score your first league goal even though there are some mitigating circumstances you have to doubt his finishing 60 million pounds he has been another poor signing unfortunately
 

gibbospurs

SC Supporter
Aug 28, 2010
5,017
6,663
the header cost us three points it was a free header from 5 yards the game was done it was a terrible miss - the other one looked fortunate to me but I haven't seen it again- I think when you get to April and have still to score your first league goal even though there are some mitigating circumstances you have to doubt his finishing 60 million pounds he has been another poor signing unfortunately
Kane missed a one vs one sitter tbf. Hit it straight at the keeper.
 

Tucker

Shitehawk
Jul 15, 2013
31,565
147,685
Stupid to judge him on this season given the injuries and chaos at the club. He’s been barely played in one of the most turgid sides we’ve had for years.

Stick him in a high pressing attack minded side and he’ll be a beast.
 

BorjeSpurs

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2007
3,318
18,636
When you look at Alexander Isak who was available with a release fee for similar money and the huge disparity in performances between the two, it certainly is looking like a poor signing. Particularly considering the calf problems that have dogged his career. Although we can only judge him properly when Kane leaves and he plays up front consistently, Isak genuinely can play up front and deeper with a creativity that Richarlison doesn't have.
Isak is actually a good player to compare him with as he has also had injury problems this season (out for 3,5 months) and have not been a guaranteed starter with Wilson starting a lot of games ahead of him.

However, in terms of results one of them has not scored all season and the other has the second best goal per game ratio in the league.
 

guy

SC Supporter
May 31, 2007
4,510
6,183
For me, the problem with Richarlison is I don't see what he excels at. He isn't really quick, not particular strong, average technical ability, doesn't seem to be a great finisher and isn't creative.
Yep same with me, and I thought the same since he first played for Watford. I couldn't believe everton paid 50mill for him, then we paid even more.

Hope we're proved wrong!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2003
9,297
11,355
Stupid to judge him on this season given the injuries and chaos at the club. He’s been barely played in one of the most turgid sides we’ve had for years.

Stick him in a high pressing attack minded side and he’ll be a beast.
Absolutely mental to judge him on anything this season considering he’s an out and and out forward and H is always going to get picked ahead of him.
Even with his injuries coupled with playing him in a position he’s not really played I don’t see how we can criticise him, he didn’t set his price tag and all joking aside twenty years ago we’d have been creaming our knickers about having a Brazilian no 9, it’s just ridiculous that we bought him in unless they know H is off at the end of the season
 

gibbospurs

SC Supporter
Aug 28, 2010
5,017
6,663
Yeah people would probably be equally upset with Kane if it wasn’t for the fact that Harry leads in PL goals this season against Richarlison by 23-0.
😂. True. Guessing he’s played a fair bit in his actual position tho? Even when Richarlison plays he’s not in his actual position.
 

chrisd2k

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2004
3,707
7,156
For me, the problem with Richarlison is I don't see what he excels at. He isn't really quick, not particularly strong, average technical ability, doesn't seem to be a great finisher and isn't creative.
Yep. But you know he scored 12 goals for Everton so that must equate to 20 for a better team, and you know his work rate...
 

ultimateloner

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2004
4,609
2,264
Absolutely mental to judge him on anything this season considering he’s an out and and out forward and H is always going to get picked ahead of him.
Even with his injuries coupled with playing him in a position he’s not really played I don’t see how we can criticise him, he didn’t set his price tag and all joking aside twenty years ago we’d have been creaming our knickers about having a Brazilian no 9, it’s just ridiculous that we bought him in unless they know H is off at the end of the season
Its very likely that Richy is H's replacement, or at least that would be DL's way of seeing it.
This is his bed-in season.
 
Top