- May 7, 2004
- 42,751
- 78,733
I don't think it's anything like the saying that about a drink driver there to be honest. That's something illegal not like a foul. It would be more like it if he had taken drugs which turned him into a nutter and put other players at risk or replaced his studs with metal shards.But you could apply that logic in all walks of life.
Its like saying someone drink drove and their driving could have resulted in someones death, but because the driver didnt lose control and plough into a group of school children its irrelevant.
whether it is irrelevant because the worst didnt happen, it was a stupid and unnecessary tackle which could have meant our best current defender was missing for another 4 games meaning we had to rely on Eric Dier, or worse.
Surely, that possible outcome makes it relevant?
I'm not sure how dangerous the challenge is, I'm seeing people talk about how he could seriously hurt Wilson but I'm not sure. He already made contact and it didn't seem that bad in real time. Its not like the Nketiah one where he raises his boot studs first but that one misses Vicario. It's also difficult with injuries, they can be freak ones or just the way a player lands. The Son red for the one on Gomes got overturned but the player gets a long term injury. Cash gets just a yellow but Bentancur is out for 3 months. Its tricky because any foul essentially could run a risk of injury in worst case scenario. Even Romero himself had one where he jumps for a header but the opponent is on the ground and leans into him while in the air and he lands awkwardly (a foul I think needs to be punished more). Worst case scenario he land on his neck. There's always a risk with fouls at the end of the day. This one wasn't deemed a red but he does have to tread carefully now. 3 games until the 5 yellow rule resets and maybe he should set that as a target to try calm down.