MOTD thread

[chas vs dave]

I think their social media may have been hacked

 

[SlotBadger]

Jonathan Pearce said he thought van de Ven’s challenge in the second half should have been a penalty.

Plonker.

 

[DarwinSpur]

Jonathan Pearce said he thought van de Ven’s challenge in the second half should have been a penalty.

Plonker.

Think he was talking about Vicario's

 

[midoshairband]

one game and the 'pundits' on MOTD are already going through Richarlisons chances and insisting Kane would have scored them all.

 

[Thenewcat]

Jonathan Pearce said he thought van de Ven’s challenge in the second half should have been a penalty.

Plonker.

He also said vicario was to blame for the second goal as the ball went under him.

 

[midoshairband]

who on earth thought Danny Murphy would be a good pundit. he has absolutely nothing useful to say except how amazing Liverpool are.

 

[bubble07]

one game and the 'pundits' on MOTD are already going through Richarlisons chances and insisting Kane would have scored them all.

This will be the running theme but the one where the defender blocked it we know kane would have revered the shot where there was a gap

 

[SlotBadger]

Think he was talking about Vicario's

Nope.

“If this is seen by VAR as being a potential penalty, I think the referee will be called to a screen and will give it.”

 

[fishhhandaricecake]

one game and the 'pundits' on MOTD are already going through Richarlisons chances and insisting Kane would have scored them all.

To be fair Kane probably would’ve but aside to Lewandoski, prime Ronaldo, Messi, Mbappe, Benzema or Haaland there aren’t many other strikers in world football the last 5-10 years who would’ve scored those chances as consistently as Kane did he has been and still is an absolutely world class striker and finisher.

Id like to see Richy if he gets a run of games in this system and after he gets his first goal because his finishing for Brazil whilst not Kane levels is pretty good , that being said we absolutely have to sign another striker.

 

[Matrix]

who on earth thought Danny Murphy would be a good pundit. he has absolutely nothing useful to say except how amazing Liverpool are.

Like most ex Liverpool pundits.

 

[chas vs dave]

Motd made the game look really one-sided towards Brentford.

 

[SlotBadger]

Are they taking the piss with the entire outro dedicated to Harry Kane? Might get over the guy leaving if you twunts stop showing him.

 

[TheChosenOne]

Like most ex Liverpool pundits.

Carragher was embarrassing with his biased reactions today in the Che/Liv

 

[1882andallthat]

Nope.

“If this is seen by VAR as being a potential penalty, I think the referee will be called to a screen and will give it.”

I agree, Jonathan Pearce would have seen it back and seen VDV got the ball first, so he was basically making it up as he went along, useless commentating, talking absolute horseshit about that being a debatable penalty there should have been no debate about it it wasn't a penalty, simple , and he was also wrong about the 2nd, no way was Vicario at fault, it took an unlucky deflection it's highly unlikely any other keeper would have saved that in those circumstances either. Again trying to wrongly criticise for criticisms sake when the criticism on that particular issue was completely unwarranted.....

 

[jolsnogross]

It's funny that Spurs fans are already so sensitive to mentions of Kane. He is phenomenal and we'll miss him and it'll be an ongoing topic for the whole season and possibly beyond.

Not having a clinical number nine is not an issue we've had for a decade, so the spotlight will be on others trying to fill that gap.

 

[TheChosenOne]

Nope.

“If this is seen by VAR as being a potential penalty, I think the referee will be called to a screen and will give it.”

Tony Harrington was the VAR robot ref, he gave the decision to call the ref to the VAR screen for the ‘penalty’ in the Southampton 3-3 game last season.
The ref yesterday (Jones) was forced into overturning his original decision by that wanker.

 

[Gassin's finest]

Are they taking the piss with the entire outro dedicated to Harry Kane? Might get over the guy leaving if you twunts stop showing him.

Everyone rubbing it in after trying to sell him for us for a decade. They can fuck off.

 

[Gassin's finest]

I agree, Jonathan Pearce would have seen it back and seen VDV got the ball first, so he was basically making it up as he went along, useless commentating, talking absolute horseshit about that being a debatable penalty there should have been no debate about it it wasn't a penalty, simple , and he was also wrong about the 2nd, no way was Vicario at fault, it took an unlucky deflection it's highly unlikely any other keeper would have saved that in those circumstances either. Again trying to wrongly criticise for criticisms sake when the criticism on that particular issue was completely unwarranted.....

Pearce is a shambles of a man, the scruffy little womble.

 

[taidgh]

Tony Harrington was the VAR robot ref, he gave the decision to call the ref to the VAR screen for the ‘penalty’ in the Southampton 3-3 game last season.
The ref yesterday (Jones) was forced into overturning his original decision by that wanker.

It was so so soft, but Son did get him on the ankle and got none of the ball. You can see why the ref missed it in real time. Hard to blame him for that really. The penalty was a product of re-refeering via VAR, as we sometimes see

 

[muppetman]

Pearce is a shambles of a man, the scruffy little womble.

He does quite a bit of the commentating for women's football and a piece of me dies every time I realise it's him. Needs to retire.