Considering Moura has played less than 30 games for Tottenham compared to Lennon's 300+, that at 26 Moura has quite possibly yet to hit his prime certainly in a Spurs shirt and that they both fundementaly play in different positions for Spurs (Moura an AM, No 10 and even n.9. Lennon largely an out and out winger with a few appearances in the hole)I feel it s unfair to compare them at this moment.
Lucas hasn’t done enough to be compared to Lennon, at the moment he can barely last 60 mins before getting hooked.
Lennon would be mighty in centre mid. He would only need to grow 6 inches and put on about 10 stone of bulk muscle. LOLI’d still take Aaron Lennon now. Homegrown and good back up for Dembele.
Odd poll. Ask in 3 years time
Lennon was great for us at the time but Poch sold him for a reason. He was meant to be in his prime
Lennon went to another level when he had competition like Routledge and Bentley but sometimes was predictable. Always went around the outside and not a great crosser at all. On his day he was fantastic but never consistently fantastic
I dont think we have seen Moura at his prime yet mate. Give it 3 years. Lennon should have been at his prime (27) when he left Spurs and declined.The question wasn't about who had a better career for spurs.
Just, if you could pick one in their prime to be in the team which one?
These are different times, and who knows what would work. I wouldn’t want Lennon to replace Dele or Eriksen or Son or even Sissoko. I can’t help thinking, though, that Lennon in front of Trips would work. And I do believe that Harry Kane would be able to make more use of Lennon’s game than most of the attackers that Azza played with.
Anyway, those were good days in their own right, and it’s hard for me to let them go.
I dont think we have seen Moura at his prime yet mate. Give it 3 years. Lennon should have been at his prime (27) when he left Spurs and declined.
Its a tough ask because Moura could take his game up a few more notches