- Mar 18, 2005
- 34,347
- 83,628
Yeah, in a thread debating whether signing Grealish would be a good idea, a poster listed two possible negatives. You quoted him and added a few more negatives. One would assume in a thread of this kind that these "negatives" would be with regard to whether Grealish would be a good signing.
However, you yourself stated that the "Irish thing" was unrelated to whether he would be a good signing for Spurs.
So what relevance does the "Irish thing" have to this thread, bearing in mind we can assume that the original poster was listing possible negatives relating to the player's suitability for Spurs?
Please answer, and without the name-calling this time.
My Grealish opinion is I don’t have one.
I watched very little of Villa last season and have read little about him.
I came into the thread as he is a potential target.
I didn’t know about the Irish thing before so was interesting to learn.
I pulled a poster up on saying the only reason people can be against the signing is he is English and plays in the Championship.
My post was relevant to the discussion, I don’t owe anymore than that.