- Mar 10, 2007
- 25,600
- 50,553
- Thread starter
- #381
Was just about to post what BBLG posted. Top man that Chris Kamara. He's unbelievable!!
The Goals on Sunday guy believe the ref made the correct call on the Hudd goal, and showed why for a completely different reason to that which anybody has given. Gallas, offside, when the ball was struck, was not interfering with play. Then it hit Baird and deflected in. He was potentially interfering with play from the Baird deflection, but that makes no difference because Baird plays for the other side. He was not interfering when Huddlestone struck the ball, and his potential interference did not begin until after the ball came off Baird. Not offside.
I like this argument. It's certainly better than mine.
Although, as Danny Blanchflower is reputed to have said, 'If a man is in an offside position and not interfering with play, why isn't he?' :grin:
there was a time when I could have answered that with easewhen f(x) = 4x-8
{[5! - f '(x)]/f '(x) - √625}/(9^2 - 8^2 - 15)
My problem with this argument is, what is there to stop a player playing a pass off an opposition defender to an offside team mate?
The offside has to be called from the moment that the first shot/pass/contact was played and not from when the defender gets a touch (unless he has full control of it).
I'm glad we didn't have Halsey as ref yesterday.
I always get them mixed up, both look like pigs/ Adrian Chiles.
Halsey's the one that had cancer then yeah? He's back reffing isn't he.
I always get them mixed up, both look like pigs/ Adrian Chiles.
Halsey's the one that had cancer then yeah? He's back reffing isn't he.
Jamie chats shit.
Jamie Redknapp has just said on Sky Sports that the goal shouldnt have stood because he knows Gallas touched it...
Jamie Redknapp has just said on Sky Sports that the goal shouldnt have stood because he knows Gallas touched it...