- Jul 24, 2005
- 30,536
- 46,630
Problem is. Those arguing is Deles case has nothing other than stats and moments of brilliance in his defense. Why? Because there’s simply no other good arguments for him.
But there are arguments for him and they've been stated, just like the arguments against him have been stated. The real problem is that judging football is all about opinions. Some people like Dele. They like his movement, that he can score incredible goals, that he's one of the few players we've got that can produce a moment of jaw dropping magic that makes going to a game worthwhile so they can ignore the way he loses possession or any of his other faults. Other people are more about the team dynamic and think he detracts from that. They'll argue that the goals and the moments aren't enough to make up for what he lacks in other areas. Either way it's all about opinions, not facts so all this stuff about proving people wrong is just a waste of breath on both sides.