- Feb 13, 2004
- 32,568
- 10,280
Just flicking through NewsNow, when I came across an article dealing withe the comparative squad ages of the various EPL teams.
We have the third lowest average age squad in the whole division, at 25 years and 33 days - and, although it doesn't specifically mention it (or very much else, for that matter), I am assuming that this is including Brad and the 497 years he drags around after himself But, seriously, that would mean that we probably have the youngest squad in the EPL, barring our reserve goalie.
Is this a good thing? A bad thing? An indifferent thing? Or does it just mean that AVB is trying to drastically reduce the squad age so that he can feel as senior compared to his players as Beetroot Head and the Whinger?
Here is the article link, even though there really isn't much in it (and it has a separate page for each club, so I'm not going to attempt to post it):
http://talksport.com/football/youngest-and-oldest-premier-league-squads-revealed-13092661622
We have the third lowest average age squad in the whole division, at 25 years and 33 days - and, although it doesn't specifically mention it (or very much else, for that matter), I am assuming that this is including Brad and the 497 years he drags around after himself But, seriously, that would mean that we probably have the youngest squad in the EPL, barring our reserve goalie.
Is this a good thing? A bad thing? An indifferent thing? Or does it just mean that AVB is trying to drastically reduce the squad age so that he can feel as senior compared to his players as Beetroot Head and the Whinger?
Here is the article link, even though there really isn't much in it (and it has a separate page for each club, so I'm not going to attempt to post it):
http://talksport.com/football/youngest-and-oldest-premier-league-squads-revealed-13092661622