- Jun 6, 2010
- 1,486
- 2,057
Anyway from the ITK sounds like we are contemplating one of these guys
I don’t have any inside knowledge. But he’s already a senior international and coaching reports have always been very positiveNor do I - i was interested in your insight into Parrot
That's the bit that doesn't add up.Why on earth would Chelsea let Giroud come to us ?
Agreed surely as many have said on here . No way would Chelsea sell us a player that might improve us.We've clearly had giroud as an option for more than a few days. Let's be honest though - this one was a no go from the start.
Why on earth would Chelsea let Giroud come to us ?
Did Parrott go out on loan? I can't keep track on who's in and out.Mind games on the lad?
NoDid Parrott go out on loan? I can't keep track on who's in and out.
That's the bit that doesn't add up.
I’d imagine there’s a bit more to it than that. Giroud was adamant he was leaving at the end of last season and agreed to stay because of their transfer ban. The fact he did them a favour and the favour could cost him a place in the Euros it might see a softening of Chelsea’s position. He wants to stay in London by all accounts and they did allow Cech a move to Arsenal as he didn’t want to up root his family.Why on earth would Chelsea let Giroud come to us ?
Cudicini?When was the last time Spurs and Chelsea did business with each other?
He’s scored about 5 max in the PL last few seasonsid take raging herpes over benteke. giroud may be a complete nonce but at least he scores regularly
You mean when we were playing at peak with a completely different manager, style, attitude and mentality?We do. I’d rather give Parrott a chance. And if not, we played without a striker when Kane has been out before with great success. It requires some tactical flexibility from Jose but remember spring 2018? We scored a against Bournemouth in an hour, 3 against Swansea in the cup and 3 in an hour away at Chelsea, no our and out striker in sight