- Sep 2, 2013
- 15,170
- 72,171
FilthPersonally both Barkley and Pereira would really excite me.
FilthPersonally both Barkley and Pereira would really excite me.
Hertyid on coys:
We certainly aren't going to spend 50-70m on one player.
I have heard nothing to indicate we are close to signing Pereira.
why would we sanction the walker move if we didn't have a backup? seems strange, and no KWP is not the answer as we know Poch wants a replacement for Walker
I am sure Levy has done it just to annoy you and others that have nothing positive to say.
I am sure Levy has done it just to annoy you and others that have nothing positive to say.
why would we sanction the walker move if we didn't have a backup? seems strange, and no KWP is not the answer as we know Poch wants a replacement for Walker
What you've done here is assume Poch doesn't consider KWP a backup.
I've not seen anything particularly substantive or sustained that suggests he "wants a replacement" as you state above. A few half-articles on Pereira and a light bit of ITK at most.
Poch's first priority is the atmosphere he creates. The team. If the current component(s) don't fit then he removes them. Adding additional components is secondary. Not in your eyes, but in his.
But seeing as you have not been our manager whilst overseeing some of the best football I've seen us play, I'm gonna (controversially) side with Poch on this one. And keep my toys firmly in my pram and my spilled milk well and truly not cried over.
Agree with your post on all but one detail. The Itk on this has been JJ several times saying there will be a replacement.What you've done here is assume Poch doesn't consider KWP a backup.
I've not seen anything particularly substantive or sustained that suggests he "wants a replacement" as you state above. A few half-articles on Pereira and a light bit of ITK at most.
Poch's first priority is the atmosphere he creates. The team. If the current component(s) don't fit then he removes them. Adding additional components is secondary. Not in your eyes, but in his.
But seeing as you have not been our manager whilst overseeing some of the best football I've seen us play, I'm gonna (controversially) side with Poch on this one. And keep my toys firmly in my pram and my spilled milk well and truly not cried over.
Agree with your post on all but one detail. The Itk on this has been JJ several times saying there will be a replacement.
"Poch wants a replacement" smacks of Poch being desperate to fill the spot. I don't see that being the case, i.e. the element of desperation is being added by the poster (which exaggerates the position greatly).
if you're criticising me for talking about ITK, which is obviously there, then why do we have this forum again?
Huh?
If you post something on a forum that I don't agree with I'm more than entitled to respond. Or have I missed something?
but your disagreement is with the existence of something objectively existent
why would we sanction the walker move if we didn't have a backup? seems strange, and no KWP is not the answer as we know Poch wants a replacement for Walker
The ITK has also stated that Trippier is the no1 Rb.
There is no rush considering we also have Dier who can play there.
We feel we have got him? That just sounds like we crept up behind him, put a sack over him, stuck him in a van and have him on the way to the airport. We're just waiting for him to be flown into London so we can take the sack off and see if it's him or a lookalike.