- Jun 20, 2012
- 23,697
- 93,518
YouTube put ads on his videos, he gets paid by YouTube depending on how many people view his videos.How does that work then? People pay to subscribe to watch a nobody watching a football match?
YouTube put ads on his videos, he gets paid by YouTube depending on how many people view his videos.How does that work then? People pay to subscribe to watch a nobody watching a football match?
I'd rather sell gear than willingly humiliate myself by talking inane nonsense into a camera at a football match I've paid good money to attend and putting said nonsense on YouTube.Maybe, better than selling drugs though. He has had a moment of fame, everyone watching his vid.
No harm in it, good luck to the kid.
Got it. Thanks.YouTube put ads on his videos, he gets paid by YouTube depending on how many people view his videos.
@rig...Football attracts scum unfortunately.
I'd rather sell gear than willingly humiliate myself by talking inane nonsense into a camera at a football match I've paid good money to attend and putting said nonsense on YouTube.
Most of them are hopeless mind you I was impressed by the Villa one that was posted in here somewhere last week, it was a good watch.That's what they think, this generation of wannabe "influencers" are going to be in for a shock when they realise 99.9% of them will never make a living out of it.
This may be me just being an old fart, but I don't get why anybody would want to film themselves (or be filmed) when they're watching a football match. Apparently this kid does it every game.
Weird.
I'm more amazed nobody around him complains tbh. If he did that in front of or behind me I'd tell him to put the equipment away and enjoy the football.Up to you but he isn't harming anyone. Watch or don't up to you.
If your gear is any good though pm me.
There was a lot of debate (maybe not as much as I am sure you don't frequent Leicester and Wolves forums), and most thought it was unjust to disallow, however last weekend there was arguably a bigger issue in respect of an offside goal by a gnats bollock, especially when the technology is not 100%
However as rightly stated this was higher profile match, of course this unjustice and also the Lamela the obvious penalty not given by VAR, because they don't want to get involved in subjective issues are causing high debate
Also how are you in shock the Aguero goal never went to VAR. He was behind the ball the whole time (if you know the offside law, that is not an offence, and would have been checked anyway as a matter of course)
Some of the posts are incredible. Corruption, conspiracy, giving up the game, ruining football, they deserved a slap etc etc.
And it was the correct decision. It did hit the player's hand and the goal was disallowed in accordance with the rules of the game.
If you can't go to a game without assaulting someone, perhaps going outside isn't for you. There's no conspiracy. There are the rules and a decision based on those rules. Perhaps the players should play within those rules. They had goals disallowed before VAR and VAR disallowed a goal last week too. The lack of awareness and sense of new-found entitlement from most in that thread is astounding. 'but we'll still win the league and it'll be even better when we do..' why? because goals scored through fouls have been disallowed correctly and you're upset about it? pff.
But yes, if some fans are going to be idiots then there will have to be heavier policing and that'll be a shame for those who just want to watch the match.
Narcissism.This may be me just being an old fart, but I don't get why anybody would want to film themselves (or be filmed) when they're watching a football match. Apparently this kid does it every game.
Weird.
Oooo, someone’s been to university!The best Thomas Hardy novel ever.
(Google him, twatters)
That isn't a rule though. You can pass the ball forwards, it isn't rugby. The fact is that when the pass was played to Aguero, he was behind the ball. That makes him onside. There's no question about it.at the time of the cross De Bryune passed it forwards, whether that is 2 inches or not it went forwards. whether you agree or disagree our views will always be the opposite in everything. the only thing I agree with is the penalty, which is something that VAR will need to get better at because something happens in the box at most corners.
It’s like that old (for a given value of ‘old’) joke:Now, there you have highlighted one of the reasons I've never used Twatter.
VLogging during matches should result in immediate ejection and a six month ban from all stadiums.
Worse than hooligans.
Might have a looky at that Bruce thread on my lunch break.View attachment 54465
just went on a newcastle forum to see what their fans were saying.... and saw that gem of a thread on mike ashley
Speaking of Newcastle, True Geordie has been trending on Twitter... Yikes
Likewise. Open-plan offices are a nightmare for people turning up their noses at furious masturbation.Someone sent me the messages. I really wish they hadn't.