- Oct 17, 2006
- 10,712
- 25,299
For your post match assessments and ratings
Agree about the front 3 and that is a good point about the midfield two they moved the ball quickly it was refreshing, Sarr also pressed well and either won the ball back or contributed to winning it back high up the pitch.So how do I say this, there were promising signs imo and performance wasn't that bad BUT THIS IS THE CL and players like
KANE, SON and DEKI really need to do better and they aren't at the moment. This is the stage to make legends of yoruselves and they were shit
Sarr and Skipp, judging they started in the CL for the first time. They both get 10's they weren't perfect but they didn't dally on the ball and moved it quickly problem is the front 3 didn't do anything when the ball got near them other than win a foul
Royal didn't do too bad either.
Perisic, I want to like him so badly but he doesn't suit this type of system game, unless we dominate possession, makes pitch smaller as well
Despite the goal the defence weren't terrible
Yep, only one I’d argue is Kane. Thought he put himself about and held possession well but splitting hairs I’d have him a 6.Forster - 6
Romero - 2
Dier - 3
Lenglet - 6
Emerson - 8
Sarr - 9
Skipp - 8
Perisic - 4
Kulusevski - 2
Kane - 5
Son - 2
subs
Davies - 1
Danjuma - 5
Richarlison - 6