What's new

The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 24th July 2021

Status
Not open for further replies.

archiewasking

Waiting for silverware..........
Jul 5, 2004
7,898
11,802
Hugely disappointed to see the WLB ITK. Felt it was coming, prayed it wasn't, now feel sick to the stomach. It feels like any slim chance we had of trophies will be leaving with Harry. And Hotspur88 saying he does expect City to make a huge offer. All the stars are aligning, but against us it seems.
 

Hotspur88

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2008
3,152
75,219
Hugely disappointed to see the WLB ITK. Felt it was coming, prayed it wasn't, now feel sick to the stomach. It feels like any slim chance we had of trophies will be leaving with Harry. And Hotspur88 saying he does expect City to make a huge offer. All the stars are aligning, but against us it seems.
Just to let you know it's purely my opinion mate and nothing else regarding City making a huge bid. I honestly don't know if they will or not, haven't got any info on that one.
 

Scott Spur

SC Supporter
Aug 9, 2011
1,991
5,620
If it’s a huge bid then personally I’m fine with that. We need to improve the squad badly now and if we can get top dollar for H when other clubs are having to sell, it could be very good for the team.

Spurs have a way of finding or developing elite players, Kane won’t be the last, we will be fine without him.
 

SpursCowboy

Well-Known Member
Jun 3, 2021
179
1,829
I honestly can live with Kane going, but only if the money is invested in Romero, another top CB and a decent striker. I could live with Jesus being included in the deal. There are far worse options.
 

sidford

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2003
11,429
30,146
Sorry lads for being thick, can't see the WLB info re Kane, anyone point it out?
 

Spartanspurs

Well-Known Member
Jul 2, 2013
427
1,862
Sorry lads for being thick, can't see the WLB info re Kane, anyone point it out?
 

Scott Spur

SC Supporter
Aug 9, 2011
1,991
5,620
Sorry lads for being thick, can't see the WLB info re Kane, anyone point it out?

What Lies Beneath said:

We don’t want to sell Kane however he will be sold if the value is met after heartfelt conversations between Levy and Harry ! This will ultimately be Daniel’s call not Paratici. I informed Rob and A&C 2 weeks ago. The feeling in our camp is that the offer will arrive regardless of them signing their other target.
 

Trix

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2004
19,633
331,700
What Lies Beneath said:

We don’t want to sell Kane however he will be sold if the value is met after heartfelt conversations between Levy and Harry ! This will ultimately be Daniel’s call not Paratici. I informed Rob and A&C 2 weeks ago. The feeling in our camp is that the offer will arrive regardless of them signing their other target.
That's always been the case. Nothing's changed in that regard. Was told it would need to be up and around a world record fee weeks ago and as far as I know that hasn't changed, and so neither has our stance. They pay up they get him. If they don't he stays.

Where exactly has this 150mil fee come from?
 

doctor stefan Freud

the tired tread of sad biology
Sep 2, 2013
15,170
72,170
That's always been the case. Nothing's changed in that regard. Was told it would need to be up and around a world record fee weeks ago and as far as I know that hasn't changed, and so neither has our stance. They pay up they get him. If they don't he stays.

Where exactly has this 150mil fee come from?
That’s just shy of 200 million. That’s a lot of investment for the squad if he did go. I’m not in any way suggesting this is the place for a discussion regarding how to spend that money but as painful as it might be seeing Kane in a City shirt, that kind of money would make the move way more palatable and I’d be impressed if Levy was able to secure something close to that figure
 

danny32

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2004
652
3,275
£150m has probably been just plucked from the air from various media sources and i believe if City really wanted him they would pay that.
£200m, I don't think they would. Only Levy knows the real figure, everything else is pure conjecture.
 

KingKay

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2004
7,292
19,153
That's always been the case. Nothing's changed in that regard. Was told it would need to be up and around a world record fee weeks ago and as far as I know that hasn't changed, and so neither has our stance. They pay up they get him. If they don't he stays.

Where exactly has this 150mil fee come from?
Agreed, not too sure that’s anything we didn’t already know.
 

Hoopspur

You have insufficient privileges to reply here!
Jun 28, 2012
6,334
9,703
I do think the later it goes on the harder the stance should be - £Xm now is definitely worth more to us than the same figure in 3.5 weeks time unless we have all our ‘ducks in the proverbial row lined up’.

Edit - I will desist with this now.
 
Last edited:

Stamford

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2015
4,210
20,147
I can't see City getting to levy's price. I'd also be very underwhelmed in our own investment so far if he were to go.
 

Guernman

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2013
1,527
7,896
I think this is going to get messy because I don't think City are going to pay a world record price or anything close. If he was their main target and they offered over £150 million now, the deal would be done pretty quickly I suspect, and Harry wouldn't need to be running off to the press every few minutes.

In other words, pretty much what is happening with Grealish by the looks of things. Because I think Grealish is their main target and they don't want to piss around but just get him in.

With Kane, I just don't think they are that desperate. It will suit them to whisper in his ear, get him to really agitate for a move and keep low balling Levy. Best case for them, they get him for a bargain, worse case he certainly won't be playing against them on the 15th.
 

worcestersauce

"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
Jan 23, 2006
27,001
45,310
That's always been the case. Nothing's changed in that regard. Was told it would need to be up and around a world record fee weeks ago and as far as I know that hasn't changed, and so neither has our stance. They pay up they get him. If they don't he stays.

Where exactly has this 150mil fee come from?
As he said, he told Rob and A&C two weeks ago so he's just reaffirming the situation, good to see you agree.
 

RJR1949

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2013
943
5,345
Don't want to start a big discussion in here as we will keep that strictly ITK but it was a little **** *** to some on a certain social media site. Everyone on here has been great ??
“Spurs ITK” is almost certainly living a narrow little life without a lpartner and where the only little bit of power he had is to “grade” the information provided by people living bigger lives with more contacts and relationships. It’s useful to have all the supposed ITK in one place but I heavily discount anyone not vetted by Rob & Co.

I really appreciate your information. Please keep providing it (and ignore the Incel on Twitter
 

stormfly

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2006
4,630
12,115
We all know Kane is class but paying 200m for a 28 year old with dodgy ankles during a pandemic is absolute madness! Surely you get Haaland for less money? Football loses its soul a little bit more every season.
 

Finchyid

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2017
3,816
12,029
We all know Kane is class but paying 200m for a 28 year old with dodgy ankles during a pandemic is absolute madness! Surely you get Haaland for less money? Football loses its soul a little bit more every season.

completely, if it’s £150m - £200m. I would take the money. We can use that on 3 players. City would have spent £250m which is obscene. I wouldn’t be saying good luck to kane either
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top