What's new

Harry Kane

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
as CEO Levy is responsible for everything including hiring Fab. Buck stops. Fab has clearly accepted the challenge though...

Im not contending Levy be blamed for not moving Kane on. Quite the opposite.

Well yeah but Paratici has taken on the responsibility as DoF and is charged with finding players and building a squad for the manager to compete with, whilst yes in regards to the success of Spurs ultimately rests on Levy's shoulders, Paratici is in a hugely important prestigious position, no good saying Levy is responsible for everything as it's like saying if Dier concedes a penalty tomorrow then Levy is responsible because the buck stops with him, ultimately there's different pressures for the different roles and as far as I see it if we sell Kane then the pressure is on Paratici to do the job we're paying him to do. If he fails then yeah Levy will get some pelters for making a poor hire but it'll be Paratici who didn't do his job.
 

McFlash

In the corner, eating crayons.
Oct 19, 2005
12,940
46,339
Sorry if I come across overdramatic. I'm just desperate for success for our club.
Screaming the same thing over and over on a fan forum isn't going to help.
We all want the club to be successful, just that some of us have learnt to tone things down at times like this.
 

DiVaio

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2020
4,181
17,426
2 months ago it was Kane will leave, Son will leave with him too despite everyone saying he signed new contract.
Now it's Kane will leave and we won't bring his replacement despite everyone saying it won't happen.

This pessimism is booring.
 

paulcumpstone

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2008
8,781
10,892
Im fairly torn still. On one hand i dont want to leave us short but on the other i also dont want a sulky player that doesnt want to be here so if the offer comes thats acceptable to the club, providing they can still get adequate replacements in id still let him go.
 

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
You can believe what you want mate. I believe in what I say, and I don't make stuff up. I just say things how they are.

Mate fuck me, I didn't ask for the soundbite to your political campaign, I was just joking with you because of the juxtaposition of somebody with realist in their title saying they're being overdramatic.
 

cliff jones

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
4,122
6,717
Well yeah but Paratici has taken on the responsibility as DoF and is charged with finding players and building a squad for the manager to compete with, whilst yes in regards to the success of Spurs ultimately rests on Levy's shoulders, Paratici is in a hugely important prestigious position, no good saying Levy is responsible for everything as it's like saying if Dier concedes a penalty tomorrow then Levy is responsible because the buck stops with him, ultimately there's different pressures for the different roles and as far as I see it if we sell Kane then the pressure is on Paratici to do the job we're paying him to do. If he fails then yeah Levy will get some pelters for making a poor hire but it'll be Paratici who didn't do his job.

your argument seems to rest on Fab telling Levy he’s not been able to line up the deal/s this late and Levy accepting that and not selling Kane as a consequence?

And Fab being a failure if Levy sells anyway?
 

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
your argument seems to rest on Fab telling Levy he’s not been able to line up the deal/s this late and Levy accepting that and not selling Kane as a consequence?

And Fab being a failure if Levy sells anyway?

If it comes out that Levy has sold Kane against Paratici wishes then that’d be on Levy but given the info we have that it’s supposedly Levy who didn’t want to sell and Paratici is the one suggesting it might be better for us, I’m basing it off that.

Personally I don’t see a scenario where Levy is selling without strong assurances from Paratici.
 

TheBlueRooster

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2005
3,818
4,707
Well yeah but Paratici has taken on the responsibility as DoF and is charged with finding players and building a squad for the manager to compete with, whilst yes in regards to the success of Spurs ultimately rests on Levy's shoulders, Paratici is in a hugely important prestigious position, no good saying Levy is responsible for everything as it's like saying if Dier concedes a penalty tomorrow then Levy is responsible because the buck stops with him, ultimately there's different pressures for the different roles and as far as I see it if we sell Kane then the pressure is on Paratici to do the job we're paying him to do. If he fails then yeah Levy will get some pelters for making a poor hire but it'll be Paratici who didn't do his job.
I doubt if any sane fan will blame FP as I think our ITK's have said DL is handling the Kane situation.
 

XIIIMPC

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2010
398
898
Im with Coops here. Kane has taken the soul out of the connection he had/was afforded with fans. He's just another footballer now taking a wage from the club. He'll never be a HODDLE, Perryman, King etc as good as he his.

Let me just preface this: I'm not saying for a moment that you specifically would "change your mind" about how you regard Kane; I think the extent to which individual fans are treated as fickle is massively overstated sometimes. At the risk of sounding like I'm defending them, I was always a bit frustrated when Chelsea got Benitez and pundits like Hansen were saying he'd be forgiven by the fans for his past comments if he won a few matches. I think it's patronising and wrong, and that was borne out by the fact that a lot of Chelsea fans still couldn't stand Benitez even though he ultimately had some success with them.

But if Kane stayed and we won stuff with him as top scorer/a highly influential player, in addition to his previous work, this saga wouldn't be a big part of the overall narrative (in the same way Rooney/Gerrard both wanting to leave in 2010/2005 were ultimately footnotes). The way Berbatov (and, honestly, Keane) left was pretty vile to me, but he was still treated as a legend when we opened the new stadium - I'd have wanted both to steer well clear, personally, and have never really forgiven either man, but there they both were. If Berbatov can recover from the way he left and went to a reprehensible club, Kane can recover from this and then some.

Basically what I'm saying is that "never" is a very strong word; I'm not dismissing you or anyone else in this thread, and whether your feelings towards him would change or not. But were Kane to stay and succeed, history suggests that the overarching narrative and feeling toward him from the majority would eventually be a positive one. Given enough time. If in 10 years we were to do a big event somewhat similar to the closure of WHL and Kane was there, I at least don't think he gets booed. For me personally, I don't know if I'll ever think of him the same way even if he stays until he retires, but time helps with that sort of thing.
 
Last edited:

TheTanguy

Well-Known Member
Sep 30, 2020
4,981
13,354
Nothing so far suggests that they would really care if they miss out on him.

They would've bought him if he was available for £100m-110m, but now? Pretty unlikely imo.
 

Ron Burgundy

SC Supporter
Jun 19, 2008
7,746
23,425


that’s just not enough. I can understand why they wouldn’t pay 150, but the Grealish deal, rightly or wrongly, has set a benchmark

However…Look at the major deals in football history - in the majority of them, the seller ends up looking like they got the better deal.

140, if done in the next few days, would probably tempt me
 
Top