What's new

Harry Kane

Hazelton

Unknown Member
Jul 11, 2011
5,733
20,000
Clearly been replaced by Haley Joel Osment while he skips training.

e0af4a81cd35a903291c310148421f64.jpg
 

Serpico

Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2019
3,072
4,561
His reputation is tarnished and he'll never be loved by the fans like he was, but that doesn't mean he won't still play for us, score goals and be supported as a player once the dust settles.

There is a middle ground here.
If he stays then yes we need to find that middle ground and get the best out of him. I just feel it could be detrimental to us moving forward. I know he’s seen as a top striker and its bonkers to believe any team would be better without him up front. I feel we could be, Its just the way I feel .
 

Snarfalicious

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2012
15,755
72,361
I’m a fickle asshole, if Harry Kane stays and scores 25 goals in the league and we get Top 4 I really won’t care about what happened this summer beyond the fact that I just won’t like him as much as a player/person. It’ll be better for Tottenham so meh, whatever.
 

olliec

Well-Known Member
Jun 20, 2012
3,608
11,835
Just wondering now Kane has returned to full training and isn’t being awkward anymore has he still tarnished his legacy now the dust has settled? I’m going to say whole heartedly that him missing a week of training doesn’t outweigh the 10 years he’s given as a professional. therefore I’m going to say it doesn’t tarnish his legacy when/if he leaves but just adds a small blip to it instead.
 

CantSmileWithoutYou

Well-Endowed Member
May 20, 2015
3,896
15,532
Just wondering now Kane has returned to full training and isn't being awkward anymore has he still tarnished his legacy now the dust has settled? I’m going to say whole heartedly that him missing a week of training doesn’t outweigh the 10 years he’s given as a professional. therefore I’m going to say it doesn’t tarnish his legacy when/if he leaves but just adds a small blip to it instead.
assumption-is.jpg
 

Darrenh61

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2018
291
329
I find this all entirely bemusing...city want Kane and bid an amount they incorrectly believed would be acceptable. We reject this outright and say he’s not for sale. City get together with Kane’s agent and reconfirm their interest, presumably they would ask what do you understand Daniel levy will trade at? strong inference this is £160m cash after add ins.
now either city know whether they’re going to Bid this or not? What would change in seven days time? Why on earth is there all this cloak and dagger?
the only thing I can imagine is that they do actually need to sell 1-2 players to fund the level of bid they know they need to reach and due to global football economy and city’s wages/position in the game they are struggling to achieve these sales.
Surely the 23/24 being mentioned occasionally is our line in the sand date for all involved this summer.
 
Top