What's new

The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - The Pinball Wizard on DEADLINE DAY!

Status
Not open for further replies.

stonebrow

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2012
1,014
2,738
Probably something to do with the fact that Pochettino never intended us to be wholly reliant on Kane as striker? Much like we did when he was out for large chunks of last season. And the fact he was clearly prepared to give Parrot minutes if required.

Mourinho's set up absolutely requires a big striker to play long balls to. We had a whole transfer window to deal with that but didn't.

So putting this "on Poch" in those circumstances would seem pretty fucking ridiculous given the outcome of this window, no?
Poch used Llorente a lot when Kane was out, granted it worked better when Son was the focal point however to say that a back up striker isn’t/wasn’t needed or addressed is Equally as ridiculous.
 

WiganSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
15,987
32,709
6-8 months is just about enough time to forget that the excuse for not investing this window was that we were keeping the powder dry. The truth is these excuses only hold if we conduct the necessary business in the summer. History tells us Levy's record in summer transfer windows is mixed at the very best.
 

Scouseyid

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2020
283
1,228
6-8 months is just about enough time to forget that the excuse for not investing this window was that we were keeping the powder dry. The truth is these excuses only hold if we conduct the necessary business in the summer. History tells us Levy's record in summer transfer windows is mixed at the very best.
But we have invested!
 

jurgen

Busy ****
Jul 5, 2008
6,744
17,318
Probably something to do with the fact that Pochettino never intended us to be wholly reliant on Kane as striker? Much like we did when he was out for large chunks of last season. And the fact he was clearly prepared to give Parrot minutes if required.

Mourinho's set up absolutely requires a big striker to play long balls to. We had a whole transfer window to deal with that but didn't.

So putting this "on Poch" in those circumstances would seem pretty fucking ridiculous given the outcome of this window, no?
Poch will continue to be a excuse for the BSoDL for some time yet.
 

nicdic

Official SC Padre
Admin
May 8, 2005
41,857
25,920
Probably something to do with the fact that Pochettino never intended us to be wholly reliant on Kane as striker? Much like we did when he was out for large chunks of last season. And the fact he was clearly prepared to give Parrot minutes if required.

Mourinho's set up absolutely requires a big striker to play long balls to. We had a whole transfer window to deal with that but didn't.

So putting this "on Poch" in those circumstances would seem pretty fucking ridiculous given the outcome of this window, no?
Poch was prepared to give Parrott minutes?
 

sidford

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2003
11,374
29,847
Ran out of time to sign E Zahavi from Guanghzou supposedly. Another name to add to the list of nearlys
 

WiganSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
15,987
32,709
So the Telegraph has linked us to some bloke we've never heard of from China, and we made a bid for Ighalo too. If that doesn't tell you that Mourinho was desperate for a striker then what does? We have failed him.
 

RJR1949

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2013
931
5,279
Jose is happy. As he said, he wanted a striker but not any old donkey for any old Dollar. There is a very good allocation of funds for the summer and we have already held talks with targets and it’s looking very good. Jose was offered Piatek permanently (22m) by Levy but said he didn’t want to pay that as wasn’t sure he was worth that. He would have taken a loan with option to get a better look at him but we couldn’t agree with Milan and then Hertha Berlin took the punt just as I thought Milan would give way. He believes he can get a better striker for better value for money in the summer and will make do with Bergwijn, Dele, Son, Lucas etc. Eze deal looking likely for the summer, we have very good relations with QPR after Clarke and Amos. We ended interest in Jarrod Bowen after signing Bergwijn. He was waiting for us all window but then Bergwign happened, and that’s the reason for West Ham’s/Palace late scramble for him. Yes I can be criticised as an optimist but believe we have really added to our rebuild this window with perm signing of Gio and signings of Gedson and Bergwijn. Yes Giroud (IMO) would’ve been an ideal scenario but wasn’t to be. We have also shifted a lot of unwanted players and opened up space in squad for the summer. Rose and KWP will be sold. Also am told Sissoko could move on in the summer, which is sad because he cares and has been a decent servant to the club, but ultimately he is getting on and is not good enough. Jose is brutal, thankfully. Go to sleep SC, see you in the summer x

Thank you for your insights.

Rob, Please give him a blue background.
 

Phomesy

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
9,188
14,102
Poch used Llorente a lot when Kane was out, granted it worked better when Son was the focal point however to say that a back up striker isn’t/wasn’t needed or addressed is Equally as ridiculous.

Rarely in the league - can’t remember him ever starting a game.

Regardless this isn’t a defence of Pochettino’s strategy just pointing out the reality that Poch can’t be held responsible for not foreseeing the requirements of his successor. Requirements that successor never got any way!

personally I’d never have let Lorente go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top