- Feb 22, 2010
- 30,024
- 29,598
Can I just say, I was right lolI actually disagree with this take
I think Horford and Richardson aren't great for your team. Both great players but I question the fit, they are most effective inside the arc and whilst I can see them capable of spreading the floor. I think you need people whose games are made for off the ball and involves cutting and beyond the arc. I have controversial opinion that you should have got rid of simmons and not fultz. Whilst Fultz isn't a superstar like simmons you would have got more and Embiid was better with him on the floor.
As for the knicks, not offering Durant a contract is stupid. Even without an Achilles he is still a player who can get his shot off and won't lose what made him a 50-40-90 player. Efficient shooting will always be a good contract and durant, with his size and skill was always a max player. The fact his athleticism wasn't the determining factor behind his good percentage made hims a low risk.
Philly didn't have spacing as Horford weren't spreading the floor, they can shoot the 3 but they aren't 3 point shooters
I thought moving Ben to the 4 was actually a good move but it was little too late