What's new

Jose Mourinho

How do you feel about Mourinho appointment

  • Excited - silverware here we come baby

    Votes: 666 46.7%
  • Meh - will give him a chance and hope he is successful

    Votes: 468 32.8%
  • Horrified - praying for the day he'll fuck off

    Votes: 292 20.5%

  • Total voters
    1,426

ILS

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2008
3,803
6,913
This is why we support Spurs. We are always one game away from greatness and yet at the same time, one game away from being an utter shambles.

It's all part of the fun!
 

Timberwolf

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2008
10,328
50,217
Soldado didn’t look suited to the Premier League. Lacked real pace and physically slight. Never understood that buy.
Yup - clearly a talented player but about as unsuited to AVB's style of play as anyone we could've signed. Someone like Negredo would've been a far better fit.
 

kendoddsdadsdogsdead

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2011
2,183
3,677
It's been performing poorly, but is it actually that bad? Toby was one of the best CBs in the league for years, Sanchez has the raw attributes to be a very good CB and was a key part of our defence in 17-18 which was excellent, while Davies is solid if unspectacular. The jury is still out on Dier at CB, and everyone knows Aurier's weaknesses, but under the right manager and with an actual defensive midfielder protecting them, this set of players is certainly no worse than most.

it is that bad I think. Alderweireld is nowhere near the same as he was although I would probably still have him starting at the moment. Sanchez, well the perception is he has the raw attributes but he gets thrown around by most physical forwards in this league, has ok pace but nothing amazing maybe similar to Aurier, hesitant doesn’t attack the ball at the right time then ends up fouling or getting on the wrong side. Aurier probably has better raw attributes than Sanchez but gets a lot more criticism. Dier is very flat footed, ball watches and struggles passing the ball through the lines into midfield. Davies is just very average at everything. That’s the painful truth I believe.

they’re maybe alright if you have everyone back defending deep in our own half like the Man Utd game but when they are tasked with defending when we are the team dominating the ball they get found out.
 
Jan 31, 2006
2,184
6,495
This is a really good comment. The same could be said for most of the signings we've made. Most have made perfect sense at the time. People like Paulinho and Soldado looked like excellent buys, but were just transfers that didn't work out. The answer to why these managers and players didn't work out is never as simple as "we just should never have bought them in in the first place".
I thought Paulinho looked class before we bought him, and class in his early games. Soldado I thought was more physical than he actually turned out to be. Both completely lost their confidence and never ever recovered
 

rossdapep

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2011
22,132
79,597
It is a bit of a funny problem isn't. Who is supposed to hire managers if only people capable of being the best managers can hire them? Going for "big names" (as in solid records) or "young and promising" doesn't seem like a bad strategy to me.

Go through them one by one I don't really have much of an issue with any of them:

Hoddle: Return of the hero with a solid resume. How would you not hire him?
Santini: In hindsight ridiculous, but solid resume from both club and country. And it was a time where many argued we should look outside of the UK. I was over the moon by the fact that we could attract someone like him by the time.
Jol: A bit random, but I am actually still a bit impressed that Levy was pragmatic enough to allow Jol after Santini.
Ramos: Like Santini he had the track record. How is that a problem? Again my remembering of it is that generally people couldn't believe that we could attract someone like Ramos.
Redknapp: Desperation move. Worked out better than most thought.
AVB: Still can't believe how good I thought that Porto team was. Fair looking to find another Mourinho or Wenger. How is that a problem?
Sherwood: I am just glad Levy didn't extent him.
Pochettino: Not much English, but he was OK?
Mourinho: I didn't mind the punt and still don't.

I think that is a fair mix of big names (Santini, Ramos and Mourinho). Up and coming (AVB and Pochettino). And some pragmatism with Jol and Redknapp.

The sad part is how it didn't last longer with Pochettino and partly Jol. Not sure who to "blame" for that. How many last that much longer?

As for who do you hire if you are not hiring big names and the "next big thing"? Was Klopp a big name coming to Liverpool? Should we stay away from Nagelsmann?

I also think one will see almost regardless of which team it is that a list of managers from 2001 will be a very mixed bag. Even City, RM, Barcelona, BM etc. will have a very very mixed bag. Doesn't mean you can't criticize Levy for that list, but I think it is half decent and would challenge anyone to find more then 1-2 clubs at our standing since 2001 with a better one overall.
The only problem I have with that is the 'type' of coach.

Hoddle - experienced at the time, not a winner but a coach with a reputation for getting teams to play well (not with us though) -

Santini - A vastly experienced coach who was much more defensive minded. - a winner

Jol - A coach who wanted his team to attack and be open. - a project coach

Ramos - A coach who wanted his team to be highly tactical/technical and disciplined. - a winner

Redknapp - A coach who wanted his teams to play on the front foot and have a go. Typical 4-4-2 football. - a short term coach

AVB - A technical/tactical coach who wanted to control games. - A project coach

Poch - A highly rated upcoming coach - A project coach

Mourinho - Pragmatic coach who has won it all - winner/short term.

As you can see we bounce around from coach to coach, no specific identity of how we want it to be. And I'd argue that two of those reactive gambles were the more successful (Jol, Redknapp) other than Poch of course.

....And that's why we don't have success or continuation. Decisions are too reactive and not made with a consistent theme.
 

jay2040

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
2,673
4,261
we’ve got a lot of quality in advanced positions but the defence we’ve got out at the moment is very poor. Probably one of the worst back fours in the league imo.

Agree that the back four are often lacking conviction and confidence. The lack of quality crosses into the box was poor. Cant see it being Jose's fault if the players are mediocre. Toby and Jan are not the same players anymore so need to move on from them.
 

jay2040

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
2,673
4,261
The only problem I have with that is the 'type' of coach.

Hoddle - experienced at the time, not a winner but a coach with a reputation for getting teams to play well (not with us though) -

Santini - A vastly experienced coach who was much more defensive minded. - a winner

Jol - A coach who wanted his team to attack and be open. - a project coach

Ramos - A coach who wanted his team to be highly tactical/technical and disciplined. - a winner

Redknapp - A coach who wanted his teams to play on the front foot and have a go. Typical 4-4-2 football. - a short term coach

AVB - A technical/tactical coach who wanted to control games. - A project coach

Poch - A highly rated upcoming coach - A project coach

Mourinho - Pragmatic coach who has won it all - winner/short term.

As you can see we bounce around from coach to coach, no specific identity of how we want it to be. And I'd argue that two of those reactive gambles were the more successful (Jol, Redknapp) other than Poch of course.

....And that's why we don't have success or continuation. Decisions are too reactive and not made with a consistent theme.

Bouncing from coach to coach is not a problem if they each get 100mil or so to build their own team.Worked for Chelsea to a degree
 

Ossie85

Rio de la Plata
Aug 2, 2008
3,919
13,223
I think we had the right coach in Poch. We should've had more patience. He was not the problem.

Now we made our bed. We need to stick with Mourinho and give him the chance. This season was always gonna end like this. We are not good enough.
That said, I don't think he's the right fit for our club and will never be. I don't think he is past his best, but his style of football and the need for mega signings doesn't fit with us as a club
 

VancouverSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 26, 2010
1,385
4,087
This is why we support Spurs. We are always one game away from greatness and yet at the same time, one game away from being an utter shambles.

It's all part of the fun!
Sadly right now we are about 30 odd games away from greatness and 1/10th of a game away from being an utter shambles.
 

muppetman

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2011
8,992
25,149
The only problem I have with that is the 'type' of coach.

Hoddle - experienced at the time, not a winner but a coach with a reputation for getting teams to play well (not with us though) -

Santini - A vastly experienced coach who was much more defensive minded. - a winner

Jol - A coach who wanted his team to attack and be open. - a project coach

Ramos - A coach who wanted his team to be highly tactical/technical and disciplined. - a winner

Redknapp - A coach who wanted his teams to play on the front foot and have a go. Typical 4-4-2 football. - a short term coach

AVB - A technical/tactical coach who wanted to control games. - A project coach

Poch - A highly rated upcoming coach - A project coach

Mourinho - Pragmatic coach who has won it all - winner/short term.

As you can see we bounce around from coach to coach, no specific identity of how we want it to be. And I'd argue that two of those reactive gambles were the more successful (Jol, Redknapp) other than Poch of course.

....And that's why we don't have success or continuation. Decisions are too reactive and not made with a consistent theme.
I like the approach of clubs like Southampton (who to be fair lost their way for a bit) who have an idea of how they want to play, a clear recruitment strategy and can then appoint a manager that fits within that "ethos".

We on the other flip-flop from one extreme to the next as you've highlighted.

I thought we were on the cusp of becoming another Monaco (back when they were good) or BVB - buy up and coming probable stars (but now at £30M a go rather than the £5M of previous years) under an exciting coach and understand that they will want to move on to bigger and better things. When they do you rake in the cash, rinse and repeat.

I don't think we can go toe to toe with the genuine superclubs - ManC, ManU, Chelsea and Liverpool but thought this should be enough to win a pot or two and exciting to watch.

Then, if succesful and the new ground does start to change the landscape maybe even think about becoming one of the superclubs.

As for Jose, he won't leave, he won't be sacked for a while so we are stuck with him but I will be amazed if Levy is going to sanction any sort of clearout and rebuild.
 

JCRD

Well-Known Member
Aug 10, 2018
19,153
30,013
The way I see it is that we saw Mourinho as someone who is better spending 15m a year at than spending 150m i.e. hoping Jose could make our team greater than the sum of its parts - that aint gonna happen obviously.

I didnt want Jose and dont blame him entirely but at the same time i think he could do better with that squad.... either need to back him with a shitload of vcash which Jose has always been about or need to bring someone who will actually coach and make players better... thats why Poch coming back makes sense but if not then Nagelsmann who i really do like if we dont want to go back to what we know.

I dont think from what we have seen on the pitch that Levy would entirely trust spending 100m on a Koullibally who Jose would want for example.

This is all about building for next season and dont think we are even towards or on that trajectory
 

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
I think Jose should be doing better with the squad that we have but I do agree with him on our mentality, it's weak and it has been since that final. I'd say that given that he hasn't had the ability to shape the squad yet and once he has had the summer then I'd be more inclined to be critical of the comments seeing as he had the chance to build add what he wants to the squad. Having said that It's also worth remembering he got the job by saying that he had everything he needed with the personnel that we have.
 

Metalhead

But that's a debate for another thread.....
Nov 24, 2013
25,407
38,422
I think Jose should be doing better with the squad that we have but I do agree with him on our mentality, it's weak and it has been since that final. I'd say that given that he hasn't had the ability to shape the squad yet and once he has had the summer then I'd be more inclined to be critical of the comments seeing as he had the chance to build add what he wants to the squad. Having said that It's also worth remembering he got the job by saying that he had everything he needed with the personnel that we have.
I guess it has been since the final hasn't it because we showed such character to get to the final. The football on the pitch wasn't amazing by that point but there was guts and still flashes of quality. Pity that it covered the cracks as Poch was clearly getting frustrated by that point.
 

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
I guess it has been since the final hasn't it because we showed such character to get to the final. The football on the pitch wasn't amazing by that point but there was guts and still flashes of quality. Pity that it covered the cracks as Poch was clearly getting frustrated by that point.

Yeah the footballing ability had long died before then but at least we still had the tenacity leading up to the final to not give up and dig in and be brave and win many football games we didn't deserve to. We now have a new manager who is at the least trying to re-implement some structure but the mental fortitude that Poch had built throughout his tenure is well and truly gone within the players.
 

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
Much better placed than when he came in though.

This constant bringing up of us being 14th is so weak, we were 14th after 12 games in and one win would take us to 5th as Jose literally proved in the next after being fucked by VAR twice which cost us 5 points which at the time of sacking would have had us 5th and 2 points clear of 6th. Is the argument is that things are better now because for one game week during a period of the season where the difference between a loss and a win was about 12 positions meant we were 14th?
 
Top