What's new

Player Paulo Dybala

Grim54

Active Member
Apr 23, 2015
66
134
I hope, like Eriksen, he now has his heart set on one specific club (us) and is prepared to wait until January/ Summer for us to deal again.

This could all come to nothing of course, if we can’t resolve the image rights issue.

Does anyone have any professional expertise in this area?
Is this a precedent?
Would it be too complicated to resolve etc?

This adds a bit of 'colour'. Worth a read.

ttps://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/brand-management/dybala-image-rights-issue-highlights-growing-importance-ip-sports-stars
 

doctor stefan Freud

the tired tread of sad biology
Sep 2, 2013
15,170
72,169
Thank you.

I’m struggling to understand the issue of image rights not being recognised in the Premier League and the implications of this. Surely if Dybala comes to us, then we can use his image in club associated media and merchandise and the company that owns his IP can’t do fuck all about it because it’s associated from within a territory that doesn’t recognise the ownership of his IP rights?
 

worcestersauce

"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
Jan 23, 2006
26,949
45,208
Thank you.

I’m struggling to understand the issue of image rights not being recognised in the Premier League and the implications of this. Surely if Dybala comes to us, then we can use his image in club associated media and merchandise and the company that owns his IP can’t do fuck all about it because it’s associated from within a territory that doesn’t recognise the ownership of his IP rights?
As I understand it part of the issue is that because of the mandatory agreement with the Premier league the Premier League itself can call on any and all of a club's players to carry out some Premier league promotions and various PR activities, this being the case they don't want to have to ask the third party for permission to use the player, refusal of which could cause difficulty with sponsors who may request a particular player and this is why they insist on the clubs owning the image rights.
For this service the Premier League pay the club at a certain rate and won't countenance paying a third party at an unspecified rate in which case they would still pay the club the going rate but the club would have to settle up with the third party at whatever rate they demand The club can't refuse the PL request but will have to pay the third party which means the club has no control over their outgoings. I can't guarantee this is the exact situation but it is certainly the gyst of it and there may be other issues as well.
 

Donki

Has a "Massive Member" Member
May 14, 2007
14,455
18,975
FIFA should work out a way forward where everyone benefits and standardise an approach to this topic.

Perhaps they're already doing this?

Ban the owning of image rights by a third party would be the best way. From what I have read these companies latch on to young players from a poor background and offer them very little compared to what a player would make if he makes it big.
 

Scissors&Tape

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2018
259
1,007
Thank you.

I’m struggling to understand the issue of image rights not being recognised in the Premier League and the implications of this. Surely if Dybala comes to us, then we can use his image in club associated media and merchandise and the company that owns his IP can’t do fuck all about it because it’s associated from within a territory that doesn’t recognise the ownership of his IP rights?

The image rights holder may not have a claim against Spurs or the PL in this scenario, but would have a claim against Dybala that he is in breach of their image rights agreement.
 

hellava_tough

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2005
9,429
12,383
Ban the owning of image rights by a third party would be the best way. From what I have read these companies latch on to young players from a poor background and offer them very little compared to what a player would make if he makes it big.

I understand your sentiment and agree that in many cases these companies are parasitic in nature.

But in fairness, they are guaranteeing a lump sum of cash, which they might not get a return on if the player gets injured, etc. And you'll probably find that there are many players from really poor backgrounds that benefit by having an injection of cash early on in their career.

So a blanket ban may not be the best way forward.

Perhaps a buy-out clause at a fair market rate, or some sort of fixed term contracts? I'm sure the clever financial bods can come up with a system that mixes utility, ROI and that doesn't exploit players and their families.
 

Donki

Has a "Massive Member" Member
May 14, 2007
14,455
18,975
I understand your sentiment and agree that in many cases these companies are parasitic in nature.

But in fairness, they are guaranteeing a lump sum of cash, which they might not get a return on if the player gets injured, etc. And you'll probably find that there are many players from really poor backgrounds that benefit by having an injection of cash early on in their career.

So a blanket ban may not be the best way forward.

Perhaps a buy-out clause at a fair market rate, or some sort of fixed term contracts? I'm sure the clever financial bods can come up with a system that mixes utility, ROI and that doesn't exploit players and their families.

It should be definitely be policed much better and I can see why young players from poor backgrounds do it, but as Dybala has seen its done him out of a move and is not forced to stay at a club that doesn't seem to want him.
 

JKendall13

Well-Known Member
Jul 2, 2012
1,040
6,953
https://gianlucadimarzio.com/it/calciomercato-juventus-aggiornamenti-news-trattative-13-agosto

From Di Marzio, who Juve fans consider Tier 1:

"And Dybala? The Argentine at the moment is not in the crosshairs of other foreign clubs: Bayern Monaco thinks of Coutinho with a "James Rodriguez" formula, while PSG have not have taken steps for the former Palermo. For now he does not look set to depart Juventus, unlike Luca Pellegrini (Cagliari), Perin, Mandzukic and Rugani. These five exits would lead Juventus not to have to make cuts in the list for Serie A, having 17 "free" players in the squad plus Pinsoglio (the third goalkeeper) and four players raised in Italian youth system."
 

nedley

John Duncan's Love Child
Jul 28, 2006
13,969
28,103
Forgive me but what was the consensus of why the deal failed to materialise from our itks perspective?

Was it Juve pulling the plug or this image rights thingy?
 

synththfc

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2017
3,740
26,716
Forgive me but what was the consensus of why the deal failed to materialise from our itks perspective?

Was it Juve pulling the plug or this image rights thingy?

The consensus among some of our reliable journalists is that Dybala would be wearing a Spurs kit right now had he not sold his image rights to that agency. No clue if ITK have commented on it or not, though.
 

S17PUR

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2006
1,313
3,829
If he doesn't leave in this window, I can't see why we wouldn't go back in for him in January, assuming the image rights problem can be solved given more time (and that was the reason the deal didn't materialise). In fact we could have the deal all set up for him to sign on January 1st.

A lot will hinge on what happens with Neymar I think.
 

Spurslove

Well-Known Member
Jul 6, 2012
6,627
9,281
If he doesn't leave in this window, I can't see why we wouldn't go back in for him in January, assuming the image rights problem can be solved given more time (and that was the reason the deal didn't materialise). In fact we could have the deal all set up for him to sign on January 1st.

A lot will hinge on what happens with Neymar I think.

Last I heard, Barcelona's representatives were flying to Paris to talk to PSG about Neymar. I have no idea if that's an accurate description of the truth, but it's what I saw on SSN yesterday.

.
 
Top